Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2024 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 11% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 190 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $59.99 vs $78.02
- Up to 30% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.32 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13562 minutes ago
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13563 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |