Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 73% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-3240 - 175 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i3-3240 - $0.34 vs $0.41 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 32% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $41.0 vs $59.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
68%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12659 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12659 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |