Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1093 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-3240 - 239 vs 238 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i3-3240 - $39.9 vs $41.0
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74598 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74598 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |