Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 91 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G1610 - 195 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-3240 - $37.0 vs $41.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i3-3240 - $0.19 vs $0.21 per FPS
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2448 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |