Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - $37.0 vs $45.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-4150 - $0.15 vs $0.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610 - 268 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3273 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |