Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 183 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 19% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $30.0 vs $37.0
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74216 minutes ago
Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor G640 2.8 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G640
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
95.94594594594594%
Multi-Core
739
98.53333333333333%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
