Buy on Amazon
$30
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4560 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1675 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Warcraft than Pentium G640 - 162 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Pentium G640 - $28.55 vs $30.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Pentium G640 - $0.18 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor G640 2.8 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G640
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$28.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4560 - 3.5 GHz - 2 cores - 4 threads - 3 MB cache - LGA1151 Socket - Box
Buy for $28.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Pentium |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
