Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 91 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 31% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $25.7 vs $37.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G1610 - $0.16 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2499 minutes ago
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2499 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
