Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4400 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1002 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1610 - 511 vs 503 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $26.99 vs $37.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing World of Tanks than Celeron G1610 - $0.05 vs $0.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
511
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4400 3.3GHz Dual-Core 2-Thread CPU Processor 3M 54W LGA 1151
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
