Buy on Amazon
$25.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240T outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3240T is 7 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Performs up to 0% better in Lost Ark than FX-4130 - 223 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-3240T - $22.92 vs $25.7
- Up to 17% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-3240T - $0.1 vs $0.12 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
