Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 98 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 38% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $22.92 vs $37.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G1610 - $0.18 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1921 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1921 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
