Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3420 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3420 is 272 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1610 - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $21.1 vs $37.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1610 - $0.16 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2258 minutes ago
Pentium G3420
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$21.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium G3420 3.2 GHz Used Dual-Core CPU Processor 3M 53W LGA 1150
Buy for $21.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2258 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G3420
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G3420 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
