Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 605 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3240T - 125 vs 115 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - $25.7 vs $41.13
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4150 - $0.22 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 756 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
115
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 754 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |