Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4130 is 272 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-4130 - $37.0 vs $41.13
- Up to 3% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4130 - $0.32 vs $0.33 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1610 - 126 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2684 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-4130 3.4 3 FCLGA 1150 Processor BX80646I34130
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2686 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
