Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 1590 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1400 - $37.0 vs $110.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 1400 - $0.26 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1610 - 148 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |