Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4170 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4170 is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-4170 - $37.0 vs $41.6
- Up to 5% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-4170 - $0.2 vs $0.21 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Celeron G1610 - 197 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-4170
Buy for $41.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-4170
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
