Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-7350K - $37.0 vs $51.6
- Up to 23% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-7350K - $0.34 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 55 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 7% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1610 - 117 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11534 minutes ago
Intel 7th Generation Core i3-7350K 4.20 GHz FCLGA1151 Desktop Processor (BX80677I37350K)
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11534 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
