Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 91 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-3240 - $37.0 vs $41.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-3240 - $0.17 vs $0.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1610 - 214 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-3240 3.4GHz 3.40GHz 3M SR0RH Socket 1155 Ivy Bridge CPU Processor
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
