Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 7% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $37.0 vs $39.9
- Up to 6% better value when playing F1 22 than Celeron G3900 - $0.15 vs $0.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610 - 256 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3111 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |