Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1610 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1610 is 185 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G550 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Celeron G550 - $37.0 vs $49.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G550 - $0.19 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11505 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11505 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |