Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 595 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 39% cheaper than Pentium G3250 - $37.0 vs $61.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium G3250 - $0.41 vs $0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1610 - 92 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16713 minutes ago
Intel Pentium Processor G3250 (3.20 GHz 32 GB, FCLGA1.150) BX80646G3250
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
