Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $37.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-7100 - $0.24 vs $0.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than Celeron G1610 - 188 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13912 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-7100 7th Gen Core Desktop Processor 3M Cache,3.90 GHz (BX80677I37100)
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
