Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1583 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220 - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $70.0 vs $79.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220 - $0.52 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 51 vs 55 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-7100 7th Gen Core Desktop Processor 3M Cache,3.90 GHz (BX80677I37100)
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4557 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) BX80637i33220
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4557 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
