Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3410 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 11% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-3220 - 355 vs 320 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $59.99 vs $79.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-3220 - $0.17 vs $0.25 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
355
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |