Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6400 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1032 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3220 - 156 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $61.8 vs $91.98
- Up to 34% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3220 - $0.4 vs $0.61 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
150
96.15384615384616%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
65.57377049180329%
Price, $
$91.98
67%
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$61.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $61.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
47.25472547254726%
Multi-Core
1085
35.89149851141251%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |