Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2378 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-6400 - 135 vs 126 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $59.99 vs $79.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-6400 - $0.44 vs $0.63 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10968 minutes ago
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10969 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |