Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1006 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G4900 - 169 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $53.55 vs $61.8
- Up to 11% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-6400 - $0.33 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
89.1891891891892%
Price, $
$61.8
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for $61.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
94.67455621301775%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
55.44554455445545%
Multi-Core
1051
34.76678795898114%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |