Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1759 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-3250 - 299 vs 297 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 17% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $56.34 vs $68.02
- Up to 17% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G4900 - $0.19 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1381 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
297
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1381 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |