Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 1402 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 25% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-3250 - 94 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $42.88 vs $56.34
- Up to 39% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-3250 - $0.46 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1430 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |