Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2517 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $58.35 vs $99.95
- Up to 36% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-10400F - $0.23 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Core i3-3250 - 276 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
254
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $58.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
63%
Price, $
$99.95
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |