Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1709 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $58.35 vs $120.58
- Up to 51% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 5 2400G - $0.23 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-3250 - 254 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
250
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $58.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
48%
Price, $
$120.58
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $120.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |