Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-10600K

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-10600K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

3.6 GHz | 4-core

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Logo
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 2400G R5 Pro 2400G R5 2400g 3.6 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread 65W CPU Processor YD240BC5M4MFB Socket AM4

Buy for $120.58 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 14 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-10600K

4.1 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i5-10600K Logo
Intel Core i5-10600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W

Buy for $143.7 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 16 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

3.6 GHz | 4-core

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Logo
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 2400G R5 Pro 2400G R5 2400g 3.6 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread 65W CPU Processor YD240BC5M4MFB Socket AM4

Buy for $120.58 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 14 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-10600K

4.1 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i5-10600K Logo
Intel Core i5-10600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W

Buy for $143.7 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 16 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

  • Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $120.58 vs $143.7
  • Up to 11% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10600K - $1.03 vs $1.16 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K

  • Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2400G - 124 vs 117 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 12 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Elden Ring.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Logo
Ryzen 5 2400G

Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018


FPS

117

94%

Value, $/FPS

$1.03/FPS

100%

Price, $

$120.58

100%

Value Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 2400G R5 Pro 2400G R5 2400g 3.6 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread 65W CPU Processor YD240BC5M4MFB Socket AM4

Buy for $120.58 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 14 minutes ago

Intel Core i5-10600K Logo
Core i5-10600K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

124

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.16/FPS

88%

Price, $

$143.7

83%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-10600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W

Buy for $143.7 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 16 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Logo
Ryzen 5 2400G

Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018

Intel Core i5-10600K Logo
Core i5-10600K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Logo
Ryzen 5 2400G

Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018


Single-Core

1057

63%

Multi-Core

3294

48%

Intel Core i5-10600K Logo
Core i5-10600K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1658

100%

Multi-Core

6838

100%

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

vs
Intel Core i5-10600K Logo

Intel Core i5-10600K

Feb 12th, 2018Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 5CollectionCore i5
Raven RidgeCodenameComet Lake
AMD Socket AM4SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
6
8Threads
12
3.6 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.8 GHz
65 W
TDP95 W
14 nmProcess Size14 nm
36.0xMultiplier
41.0x
Radeon RX Vega 11Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using Ryzen 5 2400G or Core i5-10600K

Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.