Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1304 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $56.34 vs $230.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-7700K - $0.32 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 55 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3250 - 211 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
177
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8490 minutes ago
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8491 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |