Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3865 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $56.34 vs $209.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-14400F - $0.26 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Fortnite than Core i3-3250 - 239 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
214
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2244 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
239
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
29%
Price, $
$209.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |