Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1348 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900F - 198 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $209.99 vs $225.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900F - $1.06 vs $1.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$209.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12359 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |