Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $225.0 vs $272.99
- Up to 7% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-13600K - $0.84 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Lost Ark than Core i9-10900F - 303 vs 267 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
267
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
303
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
93%
Price, $
$272.99
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $272.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 14 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |