Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 989 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-10900F - 480 vs 428 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $189.0 vs $225.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-10900F - $0.39 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3059 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
480
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3059 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |