Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Metro Exodus than Ryzen 7 2700X - 146 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $210.0 vs $225.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i9-10900F - $1.47 vs $1.54 per FPS
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4441 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
143
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |