Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 5 3600X - 542 vs 541 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $190.0 vs $217.99
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $217.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73803 minutes ago
Buy for $190 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73803 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1642
97.97136038186157%
Multi-Core
7000
83.07619273676715%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |