Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2837 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $56.34 vs $179.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-11600K - $0.12 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 45% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3250 - 659 vs 453 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
453
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1904 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
659
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
44%
Price, $
$179.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |