Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 3782 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $56.34 vs $294.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-14600KF - $0.44 vs $1.99 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3250 - 148 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 20 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
128
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4950 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
22%
Price, $
$294.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $294.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4949 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |