Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3131 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $56.34 vs $249.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-12700F - $0.3 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Valheim than Core i3-3250 - 218 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 20 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13399 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
26%
Price, $
$249.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |