Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2517 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $56.34 vs $225.99
- Up to 72% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-10700F - $0.3 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-3250 - 212 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2071 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
28%
Price, $
$225.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2072 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |