Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2837 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $48.0 vs $270.0
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-3250 - 234 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75812 minutes ago
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75813 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
22.437789962041332%
Multi-Core
1130
10.321519912312752%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |