Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1942 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $48.0 vs $750.0
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i3-3250 - 176 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 24 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76708 minutes ago
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76709 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
41.75824175824176%
Multi-Core
1130
15.159645827743493%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |