Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3496 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $55.32 vs $499.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.43 vs $3.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3250 - 150 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 32 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
128
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |