Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3504 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $48.0 vs $575.0
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 55 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 27% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3250 - 197 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 32 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75767 minutes ago
Buy for $575 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
17.13365539452496%
Multi-Core
1130
5.175651536664682%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |