Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3496 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $48.0 vs $448.88
- Up to 84% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $0.31 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 52% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3250 - 238 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10805 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
238
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
16%
Price, $
$448.88
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $448.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |