Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3506 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - $55.32 vs $398.18
- Up to 82% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7900 - $0.33 vs $1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3250 - 218 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
169
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Buy for $398.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |