Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1493 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-5930K - 183 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $197.65 vs $549.95
- Up to 64% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-5930K - $1.08 vs $3.02 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5930K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Haswell E |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |